duchesne county administration

Planning & Zoning
Commission

planning and community development

ADMINISTRATION
Assessor
Buildings and
  Grounds
Clerk-Auditor

County
  Commission
Duchesne County

  Information
  Services
Personnel
Planning and

  Community
  Development
Building Official
County Recorder
Surveyor
Treasurer
Records Retention

Duchesne County
Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting

The following document has been re-formatted from the original for Internet accessibility.  Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes, in their original format, are available through the Office of the Planning & Community Development Department.

County Administrative Offices
Duchesne, Utah
September 7, 2005 - 5:00 p.m.

In Attendance were:

Leon Sweat, Planning Commission Chairman
Michael Barneck, Planning Commission
Dean Brough, Planning Commission
Chris Peatross, Planning Commission - Excused
Shelly Fabrizio, Planning Commission
Thomas Rather, Planning Commission
Larain Mobley, Planning Commission
Mike Hyde, Community Development Administrator
Laraine Dickinson, Planning Secretary
Roland Uresk, County Attorney - Excused

Visitors: Agenda Item:
Darrin Brown Tri County Health
Richard & Kathy Ross Zone Change
B. Curtis Dastrup Zone Change
Susan Hamilton  
Rodney Rowley Bluebird Ranches Subdivision
Ron Berger Bluebird Ranches Subdivision
Gordon Moon Warm Springs Retreat Plat Amendment
Forrest Bird County Road Department Supervisor

Chairman Sweat called the meeting to order at 5:00 P.M.

PUBLIC HEARINGS:

Request by Red Cliff Development LLC to amend the Warm Springs Retreat Subdivision, Lots 9, 15, and 16, located northwest of Hanna Near the junction of Highway 35 and the North Fork Road (Section 30, Township 1 North, Range 8 West).
Gordon Moon stated they are slightly amending lots 9 and 15 making them a little larger and lot 16 the fence didn’t match the plat plan so we adjusted that in turn making that lot slightly smaller.

Mr. Hyde stated this has been run through Tri-County Health Department and they don’t seem to have any issues there in regards to wastewater systems and making lots bigger and smaller. A current title report has been submitted and all the requirements have been met, water in this area is provided by the Hanna Water District. So we are recommending that the Planning Commission approve this request to amend this plat.

Commissioner Fabrizio questioned whether or not lot 16 would be buildable. Mr. Moon stated that it was in a 2½-acre zone but being it had water 1-acre is acceptable and lot 16 is 3.33 acres.

Commissioner Rather moved to recommend approval of the amended plat for Warm Springs Retreat. Commissioner Mobley seconded the motion and it passed unanimously.

Request by Uintah Mountain Ranches Corp., requesting approval of the Bluebird Ranches Subdivision consisting of 9 lots located on 268.7 acres of land in Section 4, Township 4 South, Range 7 West, Sam’s Wash Road, Duchesne County.
     A. Preliminary Plat
     B. Final Plat

Ron Berger (President of Uintah Mtn. Ranches) asked to approve the plats for Bluebird Ranches a 9-lot recreational subdivision but would like to have waived the request for a buried water tank. Mr. Berger stated the request came long after they had applied for the subdivision and we were only told about it three weeks ago. We feel that it wouldn’t help anybody and feel that the Strawberry River being only 1¼ mile away would be sufficient enough water supply in the case of a fire. The cost of a 30,000-gallon water tank would be cost prohibitive. Mr. Berger stated he had contacted a company in California and they quoted him a price of $100,000.00 for this size of tank.

Mr. Berger stated he didn’t understand why on the county road they would be required in helping the county in widening the road so I’m asking the planning commission to waive that also.

Mr. Hyde stated the application for this preliminary plat came into us in April of 2004 about a month before the county’s new rule regarding lots under 40-acres having their own water source. The subdivision is located in an A-10 zone and all the lots meet that requirement with lots ranging from 10.33 to 73.83 acres in size. A letter of approval from Tri-County Health Department was received on November 17, 2004. The health department is requiring that the final plat contain a statement that no water is being supplied to this subdivision.

Mr. Hyde stated the subdivision would have access to the Sam’s Wash Road, which is a county road. The road department has indicated that the road is adequate to handle the additional traffic, however there is a section of the road abutting this subdivision that is narrow and needs to be widened. The Road Department would like to work with the developer to accomplish this work. There are a couple of future private roads proposed in this development that would enable lands to the east and the west to have access. A potential issue exists with the private road located between lots 2 and 3 in that it goes through a surface use easement granted to Coastal Oil and Gas and as of yet I haven’t heard from them whether they have any objection to this private road easement going through their potential oil site. Also on lot 3 the perc test hole was done in the easement of Coastal Oil and Gas and so if the potential property owner decided to build they would probably have to have a new perc test done in another place.

Mr. Hyde stated that even though the county recently changed rules regarding culinary water the rules have not changed in regarding fire protection, and they require that subdivisions provide fire protection consistent with the fire code. In this case there is no public water system in this area so there is no opportunity to provide fire hydrants or anything like that. However, the county is receiving word from the State Department of Fire and Forestry that we need to do a better job of protecting improvements, out in those Wildland-urban interface areas. The director of our Fire and Emergency Management Department indicates that the fire code for these types of wildfire prone areas requires that there be at least 1,000 gallons of water available per minute for 30 minutes and that’s how he came up with the 30,000 gallon tank. So if the developer can work something out with the Fire and Emergency Director and convince him that the Strawberry River is close enough or if a nearby spring in the area could be built into some kind of water storage facility we could eliminate the 30,000-gallon water tank requirement.

Chairman Sweat asked Mr. Bird if he could tell the committee where the Sam’s Wash Road needs attention and how the developer could help. Mr. Bird stated that just north of the subdivision lot it’s quite narrow and if the developer could have his dozer operator widen it out some then the county could come in and do the finishing touches. Chairman Sweat asked Mr. Bird if he felt comfortable in giving an estimated time and money that he thought would be involved. Mr. Bird stated that it shouldn’t take much more than 3 or 4 hours. He could work with the developer on this matter and due to this development there will be more traffic. I assume that traffic will be going towards Highway 40 rather than to the Strawberry River Road.

Rodney Rowley stated he was the surveyor on this subdivision and that he is also a firefighter for this area and it just doesn’t make sense to have a 30,000-gallon tank when you have the river right there to draft from. I don’t think that it is feasible when you look at the price of the tank. Chairman Sweat asked Mr. Rowley if he was familiar with the spring in the area and could you make a pond out of it. Mr. Rowley stated that he was familiar with the spring and that he didn’t think you could make a pond out of it.

Commissioner Peatross asked, if the Fire Official needs to sign off. Mr. Hyde stated that he doesn’t need to sign off on anything. However, we do ask him to provide comments, especially with the State coming out with some new rules in an attempt to reduce the costs of fighting fires and to protect structures out in these areas.

Commissioner Brough asked the amount of acreage involved in this subdivision. Mr. Hyde stated that there is 268.7 acres and Commissioner Brough stated that a 30,000-gallon tank wouldn’t even begin to be enough to help fight a fire. Mr. Rowley stated that if you have a tank located somewhere in the area you need to let the firefighters know where the tank is located and this just complicates things, when you could just go to the river and pump from it. Chairman Sweat asked if the tank was put in how does it get filled. Mr. Hyde stated that he would think if would be a joint effort between the developer and the Fire Department. Commissioner Barneck stated that the river should suffice for water supply, but my question is do we need to get legal access to the river or can they pull water out of the river whenever they want to and do they need to get permission to access the river when they cross over private property. Mr. Rowley replied that water rights and access rights are not an issue during fire suppression efforts.

Georg Adams entered meeting

Chairman Sweat informed Mr. Adams of the discussion pertaining to a water storage tank for fighting fires and asked if he could let the commission know what is expected of the developer. Mr. Hyde asked Mr. Adams if the river only being a 1¼-mile away would be sufficient water source versa a 30,000-gallon tank. Mr. Adams stated it isn’t a highway there down to the river but the river is a possibility or any kind of tank or pond. Mr. Adams stated that his main concerns were the roads in the area and being able to get to the river. Mr. Hyde informed Mr. Adams that Mr. Berger had inquired about a water tank and the cost would be about $100,000.00. Mr. Adams stated to Mr. Berger that he could put several tanks throughout the subdivision that it didn’t need to be one big tank. The commission’s question to Mr. Adams who’s responsibility is it to make sure that the tanks have water and Mr. Adams’s reply was either the developer or the homeowners association. Chairman Sweat indicated there isn’t a homeowners association with this particular subdivision.

Mr. Hyde stated in the subdivision ordinance it allows Mr. Adams to grant an exception to the fire protection requirements if a suitable statement is received from him or an alternative worked out. So, can you grant an exception stating that the river is only a 1½ miles away and/or smaller on site water storage? Mr. Adams stated that whatever decision is made tonight the County Commissioners will ask me if it’s feasible or not.

Commissioner Barneck asked Mr. Hyde if we can we ignore the first recommendation for a 30,000-gallon storage tank and instead state that the river will suffice. Mr. Hyde stated if you decide to delete the first recommendation you will need to modify your findings to state that the river would be good enough for fire protection.

Commissioner Peatross moved that the Planning Commission find that the Strawberry River can serve as water-storage for this project, thereby eliminating Condition #1 for a 30,000-gallon tank and approve the preliminary plat subject to Condition #2 that the developer shall negotiate an agreement with the County Road Department for the widening of a section of Sam’s Wash Road within the subdivision, with such work to be completed prior to the issuance of any building permits within the subdivision.
Commissioner Brough seconded the motion and it passed unanimously.

Chairman Sweat stated; then we will go onto the recommendation of the final plat approval of Bluebird Ranches Subdivision.

Mr. Hyde stated that everything is in order with the final plat. To be consistent the Commission should eliminate Condition #1 involving the 30,000-gallon water tank and leave Condition #2 involving working with the County Road Department in the section of road that needs some improvements.

Commissioner Barneck moved that the Planning Commission recommend to the County Commission the adoption of the Findings of Fact and Conclusions set forth in this report and approval of the final plat of Bluebird Ranches with the same conditions as in the preliminary plat. Commissioner Rather seconded that motion and it passed unanimously.

Request by Richard Ross and Curtis Dastrup to amend the county zoning map from Industrial to AR-5 (Agricultural-Residential). The subject property is described as the south half of the SW ¼ of the SE ¼ of Section 35, Township 2 South, Range 2 West, (located in the 4000 block of Ioka Lane-Highway 87).

Richard Ross stated that along with Mr. Dastrup they would like the zoning related to their properties changed from Industrial to Agricultural-Residential. Mr. Ross stated that he has a dairy there with 100 cows with a total of about 150 animals on the property. Mr. Ross stated they had just sold their home in Myton and are wanting to build a home next to their dairy when they found out that it was zoned Industrial. Mr. Dastrup stated he was unclear of when it was zoned Industrial because he doesn’t recall ever receiving a notice as to when this happened and also stated that there are several homes in the area.

Mr. Hyde stated that as near as he could tell the County rezoned this 2-mile stretch of Ioka Lane (660 feet north and 660 feet south of the highway) industrial back in 1999. Mr. Hyde stated that between 4000 West and 6000 West there is Petrolglyph, Darrel Taylor Transportation, Iowa Tanklines, Nebeker Trucking, and Arnold Engineering so at that time the county thought with these five businesses in the area it would make sense to provide more land for industrial. Mr. Hyde stated that at the time the Planning Commission and the County Commission felt more industrial area was needed because not much was available, but it seems that none of the property owners were notified of the zone change at that time. At this time Mr. Ross and Mr. Dastrup are the ones wanting the rezone but we have mailed a letter notifying the other property owners and asking them if they would like it all to be rezoned back to Agricultural-Residential or leave it Industrial.

Mr. Hyde stated in considering a proposed amendment to the Duchense County Zoning Ordinance and Map, there are 6 criteria that needs to be met.

1. The overall community benefit of the proposed amendment:
Although there are 5 businesses in the area apparently the majority of the property owners don’t want this industrial zoning.
2. Consistency with the goals and policies of the general plan:
Our plan does contain policies aimed at preserving the rural, agricultural character of the county and the lifestyle of its residents.
3. Compatibility with the neighborhood:
Although there are businesses in the area most of the land in this corridor is being used for residential and agricultural purposes.
4. What changes have occurred in the neighborhood since the zoning ordinance and map or latest amendment was enacted:
Since the Industrial zone was established in 1999, there has been no additional industrial development. Such development has occurred closer to Highway 40 and the Roosevelt Municipal Airport.
5. Whether a change in the use for the affected properties will unduly affect the uses for adjoining properties: and
The homesite would be located approximately 800 feet away from Petroglyph’s west property line and the proposed home would be located a similar distance to the northeast of the entrance to the Iowa Tanklines facility, so there is a pretty good buffer with the existing businesses.
6. Consider the interest of the applicant.
The applicant purchased an existing dairy on the ten-acre parcel and now wants to build a new home on the property. Mr. Dastrup was unaware of the 1999 rezone and wishes his land to be rezoned also.

Chairman Sweat asked Mr. Hyde if the businesses in the area had been notified of the rezoning request. Mr. Hyde stated that they had and they didn’t seem to have any objection to doing this.

Commissioner Barneck moved that the Planning Commission adopt the findings and conclusions herein and recommend approval of this rezone by the County Commissioners.  Commissioner Mobley seconded the motion and it passed unanimously.

Minutes: Approval of the August 3, 2005 minutes
Commissioner Brough moved to approve the minutes as written.
Commissioner Fabrizio seconded the motion and it passed unanimously.

Commission Comments and Staff Reports:
Mr. Hyde stated that the County Commission would be having a Public Hearing on the Subdivision and Zoning Ordinances on September 12th, with the main issue being the paving of the roads in new subdivisions.

Adjournment:
Commissioner Barneck moved to adjourn the meeting at 6:13 p.m.
Chairman Sweat seconded the motion and it passed unanimously.


 

Planning & Community
Development Department

734 North Center Street
P.O. Box 317
Duchesne, Utah 84021
(435) 738-1151
mhyde@co.duchesne.ut.us

© 1997-2000 Duchesne County, Duchesne Utah
Content Provided by Duchesne County Staff
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

web site development and design by Vision Design